Dane Sweeny vs Filip Peliwo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Efficacy: Currently, Sweeny edges out Peliwo on second serve points won at 43.01% compared to 41.48%. Could this slight advantage be a key factor in the match outcome?
• Return Game Strength: Sweeny shows a marginal edge in returning second serves, winning 48.24% of points, slightly ahead of Peliwo's 48.19%. First serve returns also favor Sweeny at 28.98% against Peliwo's 28.11%.
• Handling Pressure: Sweeny has a notable advantage under pressure, saving 54.6% of breakpoints in contrast to Peliwo's 46.27%. This is a crucial stat for predicting match dynamics.
• Match Win Rate: Over the past year, Sweeny boasts a win rate of 62.5%, slightly eclipsing Peliwo's 61.9%, indicating a consistent level of performance from Sweeny.
• Preferred Surface: Both players excel on hard courts, with Sweeny holding a slightly better win percentage of 61% compared to Peliwo's 59%.
• Event Level Experience: Sweeny has been more successful in the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K circuits, winning 76.27% of matches against Peliwo's 60.56%.
• Direct Head-to-Head: In their previous encounter, Sweeny emerged victorious in a three-set match, suggesting an edge in past head-to-head confrontations.
• Opponent Challenge Level: Sweeny has been competing against higher-ranked players, averaging a rank of 349.46 compared to Peliwo's 450.24. Does this experience give Sweeny an edge?
• Deciding Set Resilience: Both players show similar strength in deciding sets, with Sweeny winning 63% and Peliwo 61% of such situations, hinting at a closely contested match if it reaches the distance.
• Breaker Conversion: In converting break points, Sweeny slightly outperforms Peliwo at 37.94% vs. 37.04%, a nuanced edge that can impact crucial moments in the match.

Editorial Prediction (September 13, 2025, UTC):

As they prepare to face off once more, the subtle statistical edges favor Dane Sweeny, particularly in aspects like second serve performance and breakpoint conversion, which are essential in tightly contested matches.

Sweeny's experience against higher-ranked opponents and his slightly better win rate on their favored surface, hard courts, adds another layer of confidence in his potential to succeed.

While both players have shown comparable ability in deciding sets, Sweeny's past success in their direct encounters coupled with his ability to handle pressure suggest he may have the upper hand.

Considering all factors, Sweeny is projected as the favored contender to secure the win in this upcoming tennis match.